What Is a JSON Web Token (JWT)

Modern enterprise security failures increasingly originate not from broken encryption, but from misused identity and authorization mechanisms. As APIs become the dominant interface between systems, the ability to reliably convey who a caller is and what they are allowed to do has become a primary control challenge rather than an implementation detail.

Postman’s State of the API reports consistently show that APIs are now the backbone of digital products, internal platforms, and automated workflows. At the same time, Postman highlights growing concern among developers and platform teams around unauthorized API access, excessive privilege, and misuse by automated clients and AI agents. These risks are amplified by the stateless, machine to machine nature of API communication, where identity context is often reduced to what is presented in a token.

From a breach impact perspective, IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach research repeatedly demonstrates that incidents involving compromised credentials, excessive access, or improper authorization controls lead to high financial and operational costs. While IBM’s analysis spans multiple attack vectors, a recurring theme is that breaches frequently occur after authentication succeeds, when systems trust identity assertions that are too broad, outdated, or insufficiently validated.

Analyst perspectives reinforce this concern. Gartner has long warned that modern application and API breaches increasingly stem from identity centric failures, including over privileged access, token misuse, and inconsistent authorization enforcement across distributed systems. As architectures scale, identity becomes more portable, but also more fragile if not tightly governed.

JSON Web Tokens sit at the center of this tension. They are widely adopted as a mechanism for conveying identity and authorization context across APIs, yet they are often treated as a security solution rather than what they actually are: a compact container for claims. When JWTs are misunderstood or overtrusted, they can unintentionally expand attack surfaces, propagate excessive permissions, and obscure authorization failures.

Understanding what a JWT is, and just as importantly what it is not, is therefore critical for any enterprise building or operating API driven systems.

What Is a JSON Web Token (JWT)

A JSON Web Token, commonly referred to as JWT, is a compact, self contained token format used to represent claims between two parties. In practice, JWTs are most often used in APIs to convey identity and authorization context in a stateless manner.

A JWT is designed to be transmitted as part of an HTTP request, typically in an authorization header, and to be validated by the receiving service without requiring a database lookup or server side session state. This property makes JWTs well suited for distributed systems, microservices, and APIs that must scale horizontally.

At its core, a JWT is not an authentication system and not an authorization policy engine. It is a token format that carries information, such as who the caller is, what roles they hold, or what permissions they have been granted. How that information is interpreted and enforced is entirely the responsibility of the application or API consuming the token.

JWTs are digitally signed to ensure integrity. This allows a service to verify that the token has not been altered and that it was issued by a trusted authority. Some JWTs may also be encrypted, though signing alone is far more common in API environments. Importantly, signing protects the token from tampering, but it does not hide its contents from anyone who can read the token.

Because JWTs are widely adopted and easy to integrate, they are frequently treated as a default solution for securing APIs. This convenience, however, often leads to misunderstandings about what JWTs guarantee and where their responsibilities end. Correctly understanding JWTs requires separating the token itself from the authorization decisions made using the data it contains.

Structure of a JWT

A JSON Web Token is composed of three distinct parts, each serving a specific purpose. These parts are encoded separately and concatenated using periods, forming a compact string that can be transmitted safely in HTTP headers and other transport mechanisms.

At a structural level, a JWT consists of a header, a payload, and a signature. While the token appears opaque at first glance, its contents are easily decoded, which has important security implications.

1. Header

The header contains metadata about the token itself. It typically specifies the type of token and the cryptographic algorithm used to sign it.

Common header fields include:

• The token type, indicating that the structure follows the JWT specification
• The signing algorithm used to generate the signature

The header is not encrypted. Its purpose is to inform the receiving system how to verify the token, not to convey sensitive information. Trust in the header depends entirely on the signature validation that follows.

2. Payload

The payload carries the claims associated with the token. Claims are statements about the entity represented by the token and the context in which the token was issued.

Claims generally fall into three categories:

• Registered claims, which define standard fields such as issuer, expiration time, and audience
• Public claims, which may be shared across systems by agreement
• Private claims, which are application specific and defined by the issuing system

From a security perspective, the payload is the most critical part of a JWT. It often contains user identifiers, roles, scopes, or other authorization context. Like the header, the payload is encoded but not encrypted. Anyone who can access the token can read its contents.

This characteristic is frequently misunderstood and can lead to sensitive information being exposed or overly broad permissions being propagated across services.

3. Signature

The signature is what gives a JWT its integrity guarantees. It is generated by cryptographically signing the encoded header and payload using a secret key or a private key.

When a receiving system validates the signature, it can confirm two things:

• The token was issued by a trusted authority
• The header and payload have not been altered since the token was issued

If the signature validation fails, the token must be rejected. However, a valid signature only proves authenticity and integrity. It does not prove that the claims inside the token are appropriate for the requested action.

Structural Implications for Security

The structure of a JWT makes it efficient and portable, but it also places significant responsibility on the systems that consume it. Because claims are self contained and readable, any over scoping or misuse is immediately propagated wherever the token is accepted.

For enterprise environments, this means JWTs must be designed, issued, and validated with careful consideration of claim scope, lifetime, and enforcement logic. Misunderstanding the structure of a JWT often leads to authorization failures that are difficult to detect once tokens are in circulation.

How JWTs Are Used in APIs

In API driven architectures, JSON Web Tokens are commonly used as a mechanism for conveying identity and authorization context between clients and services. Their stateless nature makes them attractive for distributed systems, but it also shapes how security decisions are implemented and enforced.

1. Token Issuance

JWTs are typically issued by an identity provider or authorization service after a successful authentication event. This may involve validating user credentials, service identities, or delegated access through protocols such as OAuth. Once issued, the token represents the outcome of that authentication process.

The issuing system embeds claims into the token that describe the caller and the permissions granted. These claims are intended to be trusted by downstream APIs for the lifetime of the token.

2. Token Transmission

Once issued, the JWT is sent with each API request, most commonly in an HTTP authorization header. Because the token is self contained, the API receiving the request does not need to query a centralized session store to determine who the caller is. This design supports scalability and reduces coupling between services.

However, it also means that any system accepting the token must rely entirely on the claims presented, rather than on dynamic session state.

3. Token Validation

Before processing a request, an API validates the JWT by verifying its signature and ensuring that basic conditions such as expiration and intended audience are satisfied. Successful validation confirms that the token was issued by a trusted authority and has not been tampered with.

At this stage, many systems treat validation as sufficient proof of authorization. This assumption is a common source of risk. Validation confirms authenticity, but it does not determine whether the requested action should be permitted.

4. Authorization Decisions

After validation, APIs use the claims within the token to make authorization decisions. These claims may represent roles, scopes, or permissions. The API is responsible for mapping those claims to concrete access rules, such as whether a caller can access a specific resource or perform a particular operation.

In well designed systems, authorization checks occur at the object and action level. In practice, these checks are often simplified or inconsistently applied, leading to situations where a valid token enables access beyond its intended scope.

5. Operational Tradeoffs

JWT based authentication enables efficient, scalable API communication, but it shifts responsibility to application logic. Tokens are trusted for their entire validity period, and changes in user state or permissions are not reflected until a new token is issued.

For enterprises, this tradeoff must be managed carefully. JWTs simplify infrastructure, but they demand disciplined authorization enforcement and careful control over claim scope and token lifetime.

JWT vs Session Based Authentication

JWT based authentication and session based authentication represent two different approaches to managing identity and access in distributed systems. Both can be secure when implemented correctly, but they introduce different tradeoffs in terms of scalability, control, and risk.

In enterprise API environments, the choice between them often reflects architectural priorities rather than security guarantees alone. Understanding these differences is essential when evaluating how identity and authorization are enforced across services.

Common JWT Security Risks

While JSON Web Tokens are widely adopted in API environments, many security incidents stem not from flaws in the JWT standard itself, but from how tokens are issued, scoped, and trusted in production systems. These risks tend to emerge at scale and often remain undetected until misuse causes tangible business impact.

1. Over Privileged Claims

One of the most common JWT risks is the inclusion of overly broad claims. Tokens may grant wide roles or permissions that exceed what is required for a specific action or service. Because JWTs are trusted for their entire validity period, excessive privileges are propagated to every system that accepts the token.

This risk is amplified in microservice architectures, where a single token may be reused across multiple APIs with different security expectations.

2. Long Lived Tokens

JWTs are often issued with long expiration times to reduce authentication overhead and improve performance. While convenient, long lived tokens increase exposure when credentials are leaked, intercepted, or reused outside their intended context.

Unlike server side sessions, JWTs cannot be revoked easily once issued. If a token is compromised, it remains valid until it expires unless additional compensating controls are in place.

3. Implicit Trust in Token Validation

Many APIs treat successful signature validation as sufficient authorization. This creates a dangerous assumption that a valid token automatically implies permission to perform any requested action.

In practice, authorization failures frequently occur when APIs fail to enforce object level or action level checks, relying instead on high level roles or scopes embedded in the token.

4. Token Leakage and Reuse

Because JWTs are bearer tokens, possession implies authority. Tokens leaked through logs, browser storage, misconfigured headers, or third party integrations can be reused by unauthorized parties without additional verification.

The readability of JWT payloads further increases risk, as sensitive information embedded in claims may be exposed even when the token itself is cryptographically valid.

5. Inconsistent Authorization Enforcement

In distributed systems, different services may interpret the same claims differently. One service may enforce strict checks, while another assumes the token has already been validated elsewhere.

This inconsistency creates gaps that attackers can exploit by targeting the weakest enforcement point, often without triggering alarms.

6. Lack of Runtime Visibility

Perhaps the most systemic risk is the absence of runtime visibility into token usage. Enterprises often know how tokens are issued, but not how they are actually used across APIs in production.

Without insight into which tokens access which resources, how frequently they are used, or how their behavior changes over time, misuse blends into normal traffic and remains difficult to detect.

JWT Best Practices in Enterprise APIs

Effective use of JSON Web Tokens in enterprise environments requires disciplined design and consistent enforcement. JWTs can support scalable API architectures, but only when their limitations are acknowledged and actively managed.

1. Minimize Claim Scope

JWTs should contain only the claims required to support specific authorization decisions. Broad roles, coarse permissions, or excessive contextual data increase the blast radius of misuse. Claims should be narrowly scoped to the minimum set of actions a caller must perform, and sensitive data should never be embedded in the token payload.

2. Enforce Short Token Lifetimes

Short lived tokens reduce exposure when credentials are leaked or misused. While frequent reissuance introduces operational overhead, it significantly limits the window in which a compromised token can be exploited. For high risk operations or sensitive APIs, shorter expiration times should be the default.

3. Separate Authentication from Authorization

JWT validation should not be treated as authorization. Successful signature verification confirms token integrity and origin, but APIs must still enforce object level and action level access controls at runtime. Authorization decisions should be tied to the specific resource and operation being requested, not inferred solely from token claims.

4. Standardize Claim Interpretation Across Services

In distributed environments, inconsistencies in how claims are interpreted create hidden vulnerabilities. Enterprises should define and enforce clear standards for claim usage so that all services evaluate identity and permission data in the same way. Ambiguity in claim meaning is a common source of authorization failures.

5. Protect Tokens Throughout Their Lifecycle

JWTs should be handled as sensitive credentials. This includes preventing token exposure in logs, URLs, client side storage, or third party integrations. Transport layer protection is necessary, but it does not mitigate risks introduced by improper handling once tokens are issued.

6. Monitor Token Usage in Production

Design time controls are insufficient without visibility into how tokens are used at runtime. Enterprises should monitor which APIs tokens access, how frequently they are used, and whether their behavior aligns with expected patterns. This visibility is essential for detecting misuse that complies with formal validation rules but violates business intent.

7. Plan for Revocation and Incident Response

Because JWTs are difficult to revoke once issued, enterprises should plan compensating controls. These may include shorter lifetimes, token rotation strategies, audience restrictions, or runtime enforcement mechanisms that can block misuse even when a token remains technically valid.

Conclusion

JSON Web Tokens have become a foundational component of modern API architectures because they enable scalable, stateless identity propagation across distributed systems. When designed carefully, JWTs allow APIs to authenticate callers efficiently and make authorization decisions without centralized session state.

At the same time, JWTs introduce structural risks that are often underestimated. Tokens are trusted for their entire validity period, claims are propagated widely, and misuse frequently occurs after authentication has succeeded. Many enterprise security incidents tied to APIs stem not from broken cryptography, but from over privileged claims, inconsistent authorization enforcement, and lack of visibility into how tokens are actually used in production.

Understanding JWTs as a mechanism rather than a security solution is essential. JWTs do not enforce business rules, detect misuse, or provide evidence of correct behavior on their own. Those responsibilities remain with the systems that issue, consume, and monitor tokens over time.

This is where runtime focused API security platforms such as Levo become relevant. By observing live API traffic, correlating token usage with object access and behavior, and detecting authorization failures that occur despite valid tokens, runtime visibility complements JWT based designs. In this way, enterprises can retain the scalability benefits of JWTs while reducing the operational blind spots that tokens alone cannot address.

Get full visibility into your APIs in Real Time with Levo. Book your Demo today to implement API security seamlessly.