.jpg)
.svg)
APIs have become the primary mechanism through which modern applications expose functionality and exchange data. As enterprises adopt microservices, cloud platforms, and continuous delivery, the number of APIs operating in production environments continues to grow rapidly.
Industry research consistently highlights visibility as a core challenge. Gartner has repeatedly warned that API growth is outpacing organizations’ ability to govern and secure APIs effectively, creating blind spots across enterprise environments. These blind spots are not limited to undocumented APIs, but extend to interfaces that are never captured in inventories or governance workflows.
IBM’s security research has shown that APIs are frequently involved in data exposure and access control incidents, particularly when interfaces operate outside expected monitoring and enforcement paths. The underlying issue is not the use of APIs itself, but the lack of reliable insight into which APIs are actually handling traffic in production.
Unknown API endpoints sit at the center of this problem. They are interfaces that actively process requests but are not known to the teams responsible for security, governance, or operations. Their risk does not depend on whether they are documented or intended. It exists because execution occurs without visibility.
Unknown APIs are therefore a runtime visibility issue rather than a documentation issue. Understanding this distinction is essential to securing modern API-driven systems.
What Is an Unknown API Endpoint?
An unknown API endpoint is a production API interface that executes requests but is not recognized by central teams responsible for security, governance, or operations.
Unknown is distinct from undocumented. An undocumented endpoint might be described inadequately or not at all, yet still be recognized within team inventories. An unknown endpoint is one that is absent from inventories, specifications, monitoring dashboards, and governance workflows. Unknown also differs from internal APIs. Internal APIs may be documented and reviewed but restricted to private network access. Unknown endpoints can exist behind internal or external routing without any formal acknowledgement or oversight.
In practice, unknown endpoints are a visibility condition. They are active in execution yet absent from the systems and processes that are supposed to track and secure APIs.
How Unknown API Endpoints Are Created
Unknown API endpoints typically arise through ordinary software delivery and evolution rather than isolated errors.
Continuous integration and deployment pipelines can introduce new routes or parameters without corresponding updates to documentation or inventories. When delivery velocity outpaces governance processes, endpoints can be deployed that are not captured by intended tracking mechanisms. Feature flags and experimentation frameworks may expose conditional endpoints that are only reachable under specific conditions. If these flags are removed from governance scopes but not disabled in production, the endpoints remain accessible yet unknown.
Versioning gaps also contribute. Multiple API versions may coexist, with older or alternate routes active even as newer specifications are adopted. Changes in routing logic or API gateways can leave behind interfaces that are no longer represented in documentation.
Third party integrations, partner services, and automation frameworks can expose additional endpoints. These may be part of embedded tools, scripts, or backend workflows that do not surface to central teams.
In aggregate, these mechanisms produce interfaces that continue to handle production traffic without being visible to those responsible for securing and governing the API estate.
Why Unknown API Endpoints Are a High-Risk Attack Surface
Unknown API endpoints create risk because they operate entirely outside the control assumptions of security and governance teams.
Lack of Ownership
Unknown endpoints do not have a clearly assigned owner. No team is responsible for maintaining authentication logic, authorization rules, or lifecycle controls. When issues arise, there is often no clear path for remediation.
Absence of Security Controls
Security controls are applied based on what teams know exists. Unknown endpoints are not included in access control policies, rate limiting rules, or gateway enforcement. As a result, requests may reach backend systems without inspection or restriction.
No Monitoring or Alerting
Monitoring and alerting systems depend on predefined endpoints and traffic patterns. Unknown endpoints are not instrumented for logging, metrics, or anomaly detection. Abuse or misuse can occur without generating alerts or audit trails.
Exclusion From Security Testing
Security testing relies on target awareness. Unknown endpoints are not included in vulnerability scans, penetration tests, or compliance assessments. This allows misconfigurations and weaknesses to persist indefinitely.
Attractive Targets for Attackers
Attackers routinely probe for hidden or forgotten interfaces. An endpoint does not need to be documented to be discovered externally. Once found, unknown endpoints are often easier to exploit because they lack layered defenses.
Unknown endpoints do not introduce new vulnerabilities by themselves. They amplify risk by operating outside the controls that organizations assume are in place. Their danger lies in silent execution rather than overt misconfiguration.
Why API Documentation and Inventories Miss Unknown Endpoints
API documentation and inventories are essential tools, but they are not reliable mechanisms for discovering unknown API endpoints. Their limitations stem from how they are created and maintained, not from lack of effort.
1. Documentation Reflects Intent, Not Execution
API documentation describes how an API is intended to behave. It is typically produced during design or initial development. Once an API is deployed, documentation rarely tracks every subsequent change in routing, parameters, or exposure.
As systems evolve, documentation becomes a record of intent rather than a reflection of runtime reality.
2. Inventories Depend on Manual Registration
Most API inventories rely on teams registering APIs during onboarding or deployment. This process assumes consistent participation and accurate updates over time. In practice, APIs are added, modified, or exposed through automation without corresponding inventory updates.
Endpoints that bypass registration workflows are never captured, even though they execute in production.
3. Specification Drift Is Inevitable
OpenAPI specifications and similar artifacts are often used as authoritative sources for inventories and security tooling. Over time, code changes diverge from these specifications. New endpoints may be added, older ones may remain reachable, and parameters may change without being reflected in the spec.
When specifications drift, any inventory derived from them becomes incomplete.
4. Tooling Boundaries Limit Visibility
Documentation and inventory tools typically operate at defined integration points, such as gateways, repositories, or CI/CD stages. APIs that execute outside these boundaries remain invisible.
Internal service-to-service endpoints, conditional routes, and dynamically generated paths often fall outside the scope of these tools.
5. Discovery Is Assumed, Not Verified
Perhaps the most significant failure is the assumption that documentation and inventories are complete. Once created, they are treated as authoritative without continuous validation against production behavior.
Unknown API endpoints persist because discovery is inferred from documentation rather than verified through observation.
API documentation and inventories are necessary, but they are not sufficient. They fail to capture APIs that exist only in execution. Unknown endpoints emerge where visibility stops at design time instead of extending into runtime.
How to Detect Unknown API Endpoints in Production
Detecting unknown API endpoints requires shifting discovery from design assumptions to observed behavior. For CISOs, this means focusing on what executes, not what is documented.
Step 1: Observe Live API Traffic Across Environments
Unknown endpoints can only be detected by observing real request and response traffic in production environments. This includes external traffic as well as internal service-to-service communication.
Discovery must account for:
- North–south traffic entering the environment
- East–west traffic between internal services
- Traffic generated by automation, integrations, and background jobs
Endpoints that appear in traffic but not in inventories are candidates for further investigation.
Step 2: Compare Observed Endpoints Against Known Inventories
Once traffic is observed, detected endpoints should be compared against existing API inventories, specifications, and documentation.
This comparison helps identify:
- Endpoints that are active but undocumented
- Routes that exist outside approved API definitions
- Versioned or legacy paths that remain reachable
The goal is not to validate documentation, but to identify where execution diverges from it.
Step 3: Analyze Execution Behavior, Not Just Presence
Not all unknown endpoints present equal risk. Detection should extend beyond existence to execution characteristics.
CISOs should prioritize endpoints based on:
- Authentication and authorization behavior
- Request frequency and access patterns
- Interaction with backend systems
- Exposure to external or untrusted clients
Endpoints that process sensitive data or allow unauthenticated access require immediate attention.
Step 4: Identify Conditional and Dynamic Exposure
Many unknown endpoints are not always visible. Feature flags, configuration toggles, and conditional routing can expose endpoints only under specific conditions.
Effective detection accounts for:
- Feature-flagged routes
- Debug or administrative paths
- Conditional logic triggered by headers, parameters, or roles
Discovery must be continuous to capture these transient exposure states.
Step 5: Treat Discovery as an Ongoing Control
Unknown endpoints emerge continuously as systems evolve. Point-in-time discovery exercises quickly become outdated.
For CISOs, this means:
- Treating API discovery as a continuous process
- Integrating discovery into security monitoring workflows
- Validating discovery results against governance expectations regularly
Detection is not a one-time project. It is an operational control that must persist alongside delivery velocity.
Unknown API Endpoints vs Shadow APIs
Unknown API endpoints and shadow APIs are often grouped together, but they describe different stages of visibility and governance failure. Understanding the distinction helps security teams determine whether the primary issue is discovery or control.
Unknown API endpoints represent interfaces that are active in production but not yet recognized by central teams. Shadow APIs represent interfaces that operate outside governance expectations, regardless of whether they are known.
How These Conditions Relate
Unknown API endpoints are often the first failure state. They exist before governance decisions are even possible because the API is not visible.
Once an unknown endpoint is discovered, it does not automatically become secure. If controls are not applied consistently, it transitions into a shadow API. At that point, the organization is aware of the interface but lacks effective enforcement. From a security perspective, both conditions are dangerous. Unknown endpoints hide risk. Shadow APIs normalize it.
Effective API security requires addressing both discovery and governance. Discovery surfaces unknown endpoints. Governance determines whether they remain shadow APIs or are brought back under control.
How Levo Detects Unknown API Endpoints
Levo detects unknown API endpoints by observing API execution directly in production and comparing what is running against what is expected. Detection is grounded in runtime behavior rather than documentation, registration, or manual attestation.
Runtime API Inventory
Levo’s API Inventory capability builds an inventory based on APIs that are actually observed handling traffic. Endpoints are identified from live execution paths, including routes, methods, and access patterns that may not appear in existing inventories. This allows endpoints that are active but unrecorded to be surfaced as unknown.
API Detection Based on Execution
Levo’s API Detection capability focuses on identifying endpoints that fall outside known governance boundaries. Detection is driven by runtime signals, not by whether an API was onboarded into a management platform.
Endpoints that execute without corresponding inventory records or governance context are flagged for investigation.
Continuous API Monitoring
Levo’s API Monitoring capability tracks endpoint behavior over time. Monitoring provides visibility into how unknown endpoints are used, how frequently they are accessed, and whether their behavior changes.
This allows teams to distinguish between transient exposure and persistent unknown interfaces.
Sensitive Data Discovery
Levo’s Sensitive Data Discovery capability observes how APIs interact with data during execution. Unknown endpoints that process sensitive or regulated data are identified based on actual traffic rather than inferred intent.
This helps prioritize remediation efforts based on material risk rather than endpoint count alone.
Vulnerabilities Reporting
Levo’s Vulnerabilities Reporting capability consolidates security findings across detected APIs, including those identified as unknown. When vulnerabilities are associated with unknown endpoints, they are surfaced with execution context to support investigation and response.
Centralized Control via MCP Server
Levo’s MCP Server acts as the control plane where runtime discovery, detection, monitoring, and reporting converge. It provides a centralized view of unknown API endpoints and supports governance workflows to transition them from unknown to managed states.
Through runtime observation and correlation, Levo enables detection of unknown API endpoints based on how APIs operate in production rather than how they are described or intended.
Conclusion: Unknown Is an Execution Condition
Unknown API endpoints exist because execution outpaces visibility. They process requests, access systems, and handle data regardless of whether they are documented or inventoried.
Documentation and inventories describe intent. They do not verify runtime reality. As long as discovery relies on static artifacts, unknown endpoints will continue to exist.
Effective API security requires discovering APIs where they execute. When visibility is grounded in runtime behavior, unknown endpoints can be identified, assessed, and brought under governance before they evolve into broader control failures.
Unknown APIs are not a documentation problem. They are an execution problem, and they can only be addressed by observing systems as they run.
